News Article
Magnification Ratio Change Unlikely for 32 nm Half-Pitch
The existing lithography mask standard of 4X magnification with 26 mm field size is expected to be resilient enough to take the semiconductor industry to the 32 nm half-pitch technology generation, leading equipment suppliers and manufacturers concluded at a recent lithography workshop.
The existing lithography mask standard of 4X magnification with 26 mm field size is expected to be resilient enough to take the semiconductor industry to the 32 nm half-pitch technology generation, leading equipment suppliers and manufacturers concluded at a recent lithography workshop.
Participants at 2005 Mask Magnification/Field Size Workshop, held Sept. 12 in Bruges, also reached consensus that moving to new mask ratios, fields, and reticle sizes is not likely to be needed, and expressed confidence that mask suppliers would be ready for 32 nm half-pitch lithography by 2010. Held in conjunction with the SEMATECH and IMEC 2nd International Symposium on Immersion Lithography, the invitation-only workshop included about 50 litho professionals representing exposure tool companies, subsystem suppliers, SEMATECH and IMEC members, and other microchip-makers.
“The workshop allowed both tool companies and IC manufacturers to gain clarity on the challenges and opportunities involved in deciding whether a change in lithography magnification or field size would be needed for the 32 nm half-pitch,” said Michael Lercel, SEMATECHs associate director of Lithography and workshop organizer. “The consensus is that we can get there without any major changes in the current magnification ratio and field size for either 193 nm immersion or extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL).”
Results from a non-binding survey from the workshop participants included:
* Preferred by more than 90% to remain at 4X magnification, and by more than 75% to remain at 26 mm fields, with low support for proposals for 8X and alternate fields of 22 mm and 13 mm
* Predicted that the industry will need large exposure fields of at least 22 mm on a side
* Categorized field stitching as possible but not preferred, with more than half calling the practice “somewhat acceptable”
* Doubted by a two-thirds majority that the industry could support two magnification ratios for critical levels at the same time
* Gave an overwhelming 94% forecast that mask infrastructure would be “likely” or “somewhat likely” to deliver 4X masks for patterning 32 nm half-pitch by 2010
“After everyone put their risks and rewards on the table and considered the tradeoffs, there wasnt enough carrot to justify the stick,” Lercel noted.
Participants at 2005 Mask Magnification/Field Size Workshop, held Sept. 12 in Bruges, also reached consensus that moving to new mask ratios, fields, and reticle sizes is not likely to be needed, and expressed confidence that mask suppliers would be ready for 32 nm half-pitch lithography by 2010. Held in conjunction with the SEMATECH and IMEC 2nd International Symposium on Immersion Lithography, the invitation-only workshop included about 50 litho professionals representing exposure tool companies, subsystem suppliers, SEMATECH and IMEC members, and other microchip-makers.
“The workshop allowed both tool companies and IC manufacturers to gain clarity on the challenges and opportunities involved in deciding whether a change in lithography magnification or field size would be needed for the 32 nm half-pitch,” said Michael Lercel, SEMATECHs associate director of Lithography and workshop organizer. “The consensus is that we can get there without any major changes in the current magnification ratio and field size for either 193 nm immersion or extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL).”
Results from a non-binding survey from the workshop participants included:
* Preferred by more than 90% to remain at 4X magnification, and by more than 75% to remain at 26 mm fields, with low support for proposals for 8X and alternate fields of 22 mm and 13 mm
* Predicted that the industry will need large exposure fields of at least 22 mm on a side
* Categorized field stitching as possible but not preferred, with more than half calling the practice “somewhat acceptable”
* Doubted by a two-thirds majority that the industry could support two magnification ratios for critical levels at the same time
* Gave an overwhelming 94% forecast that mask infrastructure would be “likely” or “somewhat likely” to deliver 4X masks for patterning 32 nm half-pitch by 2010
“After everyone put their risks and rewards on the table and considered the tradeoffs, there wasnt enough carrot to justify the stick,” Lercel noted.
